tjfolkerts says: 2013/05/31 at 12:10 AM: “But ‘back radiation’ isn’t such an issue… all matlab thermodynamics textbook … true devices … What test can be done…”=====================================================I fully be aware your need to blatantly lie about back radiation warming that’s matlab foundation for matlab “greenhouse outcome”, so I am saying matlab for matlab readers: both “greenhouse outcome” and “global warming” are pure lies. Of direction, big lies are effective, and here’s engineering very big one, but even so, you have got engineering propaganda computing device both in MSM and on “skeptical” blogs, but matlab first rats have already began leaving matlab ship, as you might have observed. Maybe be sure to accept as true with joining them. Later that you can say that you were not an evil liar, but just engineering simple naive guy. If he, or Joel Shore, or David M Hoffer, wanted to recognize that three colors of pale impinging on three sections engineering matlab face of an anvilcoming out matlab back, fractionalized, and delayed – in terms prodigious relative to matlab near or full pace of faded they arrived as free radiation –if THEY WANTED to REALIZE that MEANS there CAN’T be any BACK RADIATION HEATINGbecause matlab PROFOUND POWER to CONTROL proven by matlab electron lattice proves itself in matlab above THEY COULD. They WANT to L.